TOTAL BODY PET [TB-PET]: A DESIRE OR NEED?

Authors

  • Maseeh uz Zaman Dept of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan
  • Nosheen Fatima Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan
  • Areeba Zaman Dept of Medicine, Sunny Downstate University, NY
  • Unaiza Zaman Dept of Heam-Oncology, Oklahoma University
  • Sidra Zaman Dept of Medicine, Dr Ruth Pfau Hospital, Karachi

Abstract

In current era positron imaging tomography (PET) with computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most widely used hybrid imaging modalities in clinical arena. In fact, it has revolutionized the staging, restaging, selection of therapy and response assessment in various malignancies. However, we must be cognizant of PET’s journey which started from a research laboratory of Massachusetts General Hospital, USA in 1951 to 1999 when first commercial hybrid PET/CT was introduced by Townsend and team in USA and Time Magazinecalled it medical invention of the year in 2000.PET with CT and MRI is believed the most sensitive hybrid technique available to study physiology, metabolism, and various molecular pathways in human being. However, one must not forget the limitations of PET imaging like extremely poor sensitivity (<1%), limited resolution due to low signal to noise ratio (SNR), long acquisition times and concerns about radiation exposure. Two major factors which govern the poor sensitivity of existing PET scanners are (1) 85-90% of body is outside of field of view (FOV) and no signal is from these regions is collected; (2) only 3-5% of signals

References

. PET/CT today and tomorrow. Townsend DW, Carney PJ, Yap JY, Hall NC. Jonathan PJ. Jourl Nucl Med 2004; 45 (1suppl): 4S-14S

. Cherry SR, Jones T, Karp JS, Qi J, Moses WM,4 Badawi RD. Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care. J Nucl Med. 2018 Jan; 59(1): 3–12.

. Hui T, Yusen G, Haojun Y, Pengcheng H, Yiqiu Z, Wujian M, et al. Total-Body PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. AJR 2020; 215:325–37

. Pepin CM. Properties of LYSO and recent LSO scintillators for Phoswich PET detectors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2004; 51:789–95

. Pantel AR, Viswanath V, Daube-Witherspoon ME. PennPET Explorer: human imaging on a whole-body imager. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:144–151.

. Alberts I, H€unermund JN, Prenosil G, Mingels C, Bohn KP, Viscione M, et al. Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2395–2404.

Downloads

Published

21-11-2022

How to Cite

uz Zaman, M., Fatima, N., Zaman, A., Zaman, U., & Zaman, S. (2022). TOTAL BODY PET [TB-PET]: A DESIRE OR NEED?. Pakistan Journal of Radiology, 32(4). Retrieved from https://pakjr.com/index.php/PJR/article/view/1625

Issue

Section

Editorial